Category: Alternative Fee Arrangements

Partner Compensation: The Catalyst for Law Firm Innovation

Many firms get stuck at the same critical point with legal innovation. They’ve brought in AI and introduced value-based pricing. A firm strategic plan has been signed off on. Everything looks ready to go.

Then nothing clicks.

These firms struggle to identify the barriers preventing them from moving forward with their innovation efforts. They have AI that could make them efficient and effective. They have value-based pricing that could recognize their increased efficiency. They have strategies to implement everything and get it working in concert.

But there’s still a missing link: partner compensation.

The Four Drivers That Must Work Together

Real change requires four connected elements. Many firms focus on three and wonder why the fourth derails everything.

You need a strategic plan with clear firm goals that support legal innovation. Without direction, changes become random experiments rather than coordinated change.

You need a value-based pricing strategy that recovers efficiency gains. Fixed-fee billing and value-based arrangements reward results instead of time spent.

You need AI that improves effectiveness. The technology exists to streamline legal work dramatically.

And finally, you need a compensation system that incentivizes partners to achieve the tasks required to contribute to the firm’s innovation goals.

Why Compensation Is the Missing Link

You need to align your partner compensation system with your firm’s strategic innovation goals and modify compensation systems that primarily depend on billable hours.

Most firms are strongly opposed to changing their compensation system. However, it is often necessary to implement AI and value-based pricing. When compensation rewards billable hours above everything else, partners resist AI that reduces those hours. Their income depends on maximizing time billed, so they’ll protect that model regardless of firm strategy.

How Compensation Needs to Change for Innovation

Some ideas for linking compensation to innovation include focusing compensation more on revenues and nonbillable contributions instead of individual billable hours. Partners will be incentivized by proactive individual plans that help achieve strategic firm objectives, including AI implementation and value-based pricing. Management will oversee these plans and report on partner performance for comp purposes. Just a couple of the changes needed to foster innovation in law firms.

Most law firms focus on incentives for short-term profit, such as billable hours/production, and little on nonbillable innovations, like AI implementation and value-based pricing, which contribute to long-term profitability. This needs to change.

Clients are quickly catching on to the benefits of AI and will switch away from law firms that don’t adapt their processes, pricing and incentive systems to meet their needs. Therefore, partners currently married to time billing should be encouraged to transition to fixed or value-based pricing models where feasible.

The Urgency Is Real

You can’t escape changing your compensation system in this new environment. The legal market is shifting, whether you participate or not. AI will continue to advance, and client expectations will keep evolving toward value-based relationships.

The technology exists. The pricing models work. The only thing standing between most firms and successful innovation is their willingness to align compensation with their strategic goals.

Stop going in circles. Address compensation now, or risk losing clients and partners in an environment that demands innovation to survive.

Pricing the Client, Not the Work: A More Flexible, Value-Driven Approach to Legal Billing

I often see lawyers debating on LinkedIn about the merits and disadvantages of hourly billing versus value-based pricing. I don’t see it as a question of doing it one way vs. the other. Each client will have their own unique needs regarding how they prefer to be billed. And it doesn’t have to be just one way. The right way to price/bill is the one that best meets your client’s needs.

We need to start offering options: that could mean two or three different options, including hourly billing or value-based pricing, or a hybrid billing option, which includes a monthly retainer plus hourly billing, etc. This is my twist on “Price the client, not the work”, as Ron Baker recommends.

Clients Have Different Needs, So Give Them Different Options

Some clients still prefer hourly billing. Others want predictability through flat fees or monthly retainers. Some are open to value-based pricing or outcome-contingent models. A few are even willing to pay a premium for guarantees or guaranteed availability.

All of these models can coexist. Your job is not to convince every client to fit your preferred pricing/billing method. Your job is to understand what the client values, then design a fee structure that reflects that.

In Implementing Value Pricing, Ron Baker lays out a clear, eight-step process for moving firms toward value-based pricing models. But even Baker doesn’t argue that it’s all or nothing. Instead, it’s about moving along a continuum, away from pricing based on effort, toward pricing based on value.

Hourly Billing Isn’t Going Anywhere, But It Shouldn’t Be the Only Option

Let’s be realistic: hourly billing isn’t disappearing anytime soon. And that’s okay. What we can do is evolve from relying on it as our only pricing model.

Hybrid models are often more practical and better aligned with both firm and client interests. A client might be on a monthly flat fee for routine advisory work, with defined scope projects priced at a fixed fee, and a litigation file on a success-based arrangement.

The point is flexibility. And when you build tailored fee structures, you change the conversation from “what’s your hourly rate?” to “how can we work together in a way that makes sense for both of us?”

Unique Pricing Drives Unique Value and Breaks the Race to the Bottom

If your pricing model looks like everyone else’s, then you’re just another commodity. That’s when clients start comparison shopping based on price alone.

But if you’re structuring your pricing based on deep knowledge of the client’s goals and preferred ways of working, you’re no longer interchangeable. You’re delivering something tailored and valuable. You’re a legal professional, not a plumber.

And most importantly, you’re helping the client win, which means you’ll win too.

Track Your Time Even When You’re Not Billing It

One more essential point: I believe you should still record time, even when using non-hourly billing models.

Time tracking isn’t just for billing. It’s how you understand your internal costs, opportunity costs, and profitability. If you abandon time tracking altogether, you lose visibility into whether a fixed fee or value-based arrangement is actually working for your business.

Think of it as managing a portfolio. You need data to know what’s sustainable and where the value really lies.

Value Pricing Doesn’t Mean Taking All the Risk

A lot of firms resist alternative billing because they think it means giving up control or taking on all the risk. But that’s not the point.

A good pricing model finds a win-win. The client gets predictability or performance incentives, whatever they need most. The firm gets fair compensation aligned with results and client satisfaction.

Bartlit Beck LLP, the original poster child for alternative billing, still did 50% of its work on an hourly basis in the early years. Why? Because not every client was ready to make the shift. Some simply weren’t comfortable. And even the most visionary firms need to meet clients where they are.

Stop Arguing. Start Listening.

We don’t need to keep arguing about which model is superior. Hourly billing is not the villain. Value pricing isn’t a panacea. What matters is what your client wants and needs.

If you build pricing options around that, you’ll build trust and long-term success for both you and your clients.

References and Further Reading:

  • Ron Baker, Implementing Value Pricing: A Radical Business Model for Professional Firms
  • The American Lawyer (1995), Diamonds Are This Firm’s Best Friend – Profile of Bartlit Beck and its hybrid approach to alternative fees
round metal frame with disco light

What the Law Firm of the Future Looks Like: Strategy, Structure, and Supercharged Lawyers

I was pleased to be interviewed recently by Michelle Crawford, Founder of Being More Human, for their webinar, “The Law Firm of the Future,” which was presented in Newcastle, Australia, on June 24, 2025.

Here’s a summary of my interview with Michelle. I shared my views on the future of law firms, AI and the leadership qualities that will define success over the next decade.

Breaking Free from the Pyramid

When Michelle asked me what the law firm of the future means to me, I told her we need to move beyond the traditional pyramid structure we’ve relied on for decades. That model, where equity partners sit at the top, supported by layers of associates and staff, has worked for a long time. But it’s not built for what’s coming next.

With AI and other technologies transforming how legal work gets done, I see firms shifting toward a flatter, platform-based structure. This will be a more client-centered, collaborative structure, with success measured by outcomes and value created, not just time. We won’t need as many associates performing repetitive tasks, and we’ll start integrating professionals from outside traditional legal roles, such as legal engineers and data analysts.

Equity partners will still play a vital role, but the real value will come from how well we can deliver outcomes through innovative systems and multidisciplinary collaboration. Power dynamics within firms will shift, too. Influence won’t just come from seniority or book of business; it will come from how well you can contribute to a team that’s built for speed and client value.

The Most Critical Changes Firms Must Make

When I look at how law firms currently operate, I see two changes that can’t wait any longer.

First, we need to move away from time-based billing. As we adopt AI and become more efficient, relying solely on billable hours starts to work against us. If we’re doing things faster but still charging by the hour, we’re shrinking our revenue. That’s why I encourage firms to take value-based pricing seriously; pricing based on the outcome or the value to the client, rather than the time spent.

The second adjustment is building real support for AI implementation. This isn’t something lawyers can do alone. We need legal engineers and operational professionals who understand how to integrate technology in a way that delivers genuine value. Efficiency on its own isn’t enough; we must connect it to pricing and the client experience.

Starting the AI Journey Right

I always tell firms to start with their workflows, not with tools. Before investing in AI or diving into platforms like ChatGPT, map out your processes. Where are the inefficiencies? Where are you duplicating effort or overcomplicating tasks?

Sometimes the answer isn’t to automate, it’s to eliminate or redesign. If a workflow is broken, automating it makes you faster at doing the wrong thing. Once you’ve rethought your processes, you can explore tools that help you do things more efficiently and effectively.

It’s also critical to set policies around AI use. These technologies are advancing rapidly, and you must manage issues like hallucinations and data security. A recent Thomson Reuters survey showed that regular AI usage among lawyers doubled in a year, from 20% to 40%. This is moving fast. If you haven’t started, the best time is now.

Culture and Talent: The Human Side of Transformation

Culturally, firms need to rethink their leadership style in this new platform structure. You’re bringing in a broader mix of multidisciplinary professionals, and need leaders who know how to work collaboratively and lead diverse teams.

That means making space for empathy and inclusive leadership. Emotional intelligence is going to become more critical than ever. AI can handle a significant amount of legal grunt work, but it cannot replace the client relationship and business development functions. That’s where people will shine.

Job descriptions will also change dramatically. Team members won’t just be “partners,” “lawyers,” or “staff.” They’ll be contributors in a flexible, tech-enabled system. And firms that adapt their culture to that reality will attract the best talent.

My Bold Prediction for 2035

By 2035, we may no longer refer to them as law firms. We’ll be seeing global platforms that bring together lawyers and multidisciplinary professionals under one roof. Midsized firms will get squeezed as their clients accelerate the adoption of AI for in-house legal work. Smaller firms that supercharge their lawyers using AI will be a force to be reckoned with.

And I hope we retire the term “non-lawyer.” Everyone who contributes to client outcomes, whether they’re a lawyer or not, deserves equal recognition and opportunity. We shouldn’t define people by what they aren’t.

We’ll also see changes in ownership models. In some parts of the world, such as the UK, non-lawyer ownership and multidisciplinary practices are already well-established. That change is happening slower in North America, but it’s coming, and AI is accelerating it.

I believe firms will become increasingly integrated, with fewer silos and a greater focus on collaboration across disciplines. That’s how we’ll deliver high-value services and meet our clients’ evolving needs.

The future belongs to firms that can adapt quickly and focus on delivering value to clients. The transformation is already underway; the question is whether your firm will lead it or be left behind.