Tag: AI

Rethinking the COO Role in Law Firms

Law firms have always been led by lawyers. The senior partner was often both rainmaker and chief administrator, managing everything from finances to facilities. That model worked when the business of law was simpler and the competition was local. It no longer fits the complexity of today’s legal market.

It is time to rethink what this role should entail and who is best suited for it.

The Role of the COO

The main role of a COO in a law firm is to run the firm’s business operations. Partners’ time is best spent practicing law and building client relationships. Someone must ensure that the business runs efficiently behind the scenes.

The COO position includes creating the systems and discipline that enable partners to focus on client work. A strong COO connects the dots between finance, operations, people, and strategy. This relieves partners of this task and helps execute the firm’s goals.

The New Skills Required

The skill set for today’s COO has changed. Now legal COOs must be fluent in both management skills and technology. They must understand automation and AI applications that can streamline workflows and improve decision-making.

Strong COOs now act as translators between business strategy and operational execution. They can analyze profitability at the matter and client level. They can interpret financial and operational data to guide strategic investments. And they can communicate these insights to lawyers in ways that lead to action.

The most effective COOs combine four abilities:

  • Operational discipline to ensure the firm’s core systems run smoothly.
  • Financial literacy to create budgets and new pricing models.
  • Technology fluency to identify where automation and AI create leverage.
  • Leadership credibility to influence senior lawyers without authority based on title.

These abilities rarely come from the traditional legal path. That is why many of the most successful COOs in professional services come from finance, consulting, or technology backgrounds.

Why Some Firms Struggle to Empower the COO

Even when firms hire a capable COO, many fail to use the role effectively. In some partnerships, operations managers are limited to managing facilities, HR, or IT. This limits the COO’s ability to execute. Without clear authority, the role becomes reactive rather than strategic.

Empowering a COO requires the managing partner and the executive committee to treat the role as part of firm leadership, not support staff. The COO should sit at the table where strategic and financial decisions are made, with access to the same data and accountability.

The COO and Change Management

Law firms face rising cost pressures and technology-driven disruption. These challenges cannot be solved through individual effort or incremental change. They require systemic thinking, the kind that a professional COO brings.

A forward-looking COO can lead firmwide initiatives in areas such as:

  • Redesigning work allocation models that improve leverage and profitability.
  • Introducing firm-level KPIs and dashboards to measure performance in real time.
  • Managing AI adoption projects across practice groups.
  • Building training programs that develop “business of law” concepts among lawyers.

The goal is to help the Managing Partner execute on the firm’s strategic plan. The COO becomes the connection that links strategy with day-to-day execution. COOs can also take on many of the regular duties of the Managing Partner so that they can focus on higher-level firm strategy and leadership objectives.

What Law Firms Should Do Next

Every firm should begin by asking a simple question: What is our COO actually accountable for? If the answer sounds administrative rather than strategic, the firm may be missing an opportunity.

The next step is to align the COO’s role with measurable outcomes. Examples include improvement in profit per partner or percentage of work automated. These are results that move the firm forward and justify the investment in senior operational leadership.

Closing Thoughts

The modern law firm operates more like a business than a traditional partnership. Rethinking the COO role involves giving COOs more authority and accountability to give the firm a strategic advantage. This can also lead to non-lawyer COOs becoming CEOs or recruiting non-lawyer CEOs from other industries. Given the immense changes happening in the legal industry today, high-end professional management in law firms is becoming a must-have in order to succeed.

Can a Small or Mid-sized Firm Lead the Legal Transformation?

How Smaller Firms Can Adapt the Four-Pillar Blueprint to Win

The legal industry stands at a crossroads. While Big Law firms grapple with their transformation challenges, smaller and mid-sized firms possess a hidden advantage that could reshape the competitive landscape entirely.

A compelling strategic framework, introduced by Ted Theodoropoulos in his article “Big Law 2.0: A Radical Transformation Blueprint” (May 2025), outlines a powerful approach. Theodoropoulos proposes that firms revisit their foundational strategies around structure, funding, talent, and delivery.

Although his blueprint targets large firms and assumes eventual regulatory reform, the core concepts are highly relevant to firms with fewer than 100 lawyers. With some adjustments, smaller firms can use this approach to create meaningful differentiation and future-proof their practices.

Pillar 1: Create a “NewLaw” Division Inside the Firm

Rather than splitting the firm into two separate entities, a smaller firm can carve out a focused internal division dedicated to innovation. This unit can run pilot programs that test new service models, such as fixed-fee offerings, AI-assisted research, or client subscription packages.

Even a small team, e.g. one or two lawyers supported by a tech-savvy coordinator, can progress if given the space to operate outside traditional billable-hour metrics.

Why this matters for smaller firms:
Mid-sized firms are typically more agile than large national or international firms. This agility allows them to pilot new approaches without being delayed by layers of internal approval. Small, targeted projects launched today can generate a lasting competitive advantage.

Pillar 2: Fund Innovation with Purpose (No Outside Capital Required)

Theodoropoulos advocates for private equity or IPO capital in the original blueprint to drive innovation. While this may be viable in jurisdictions with alternative business structures, most Canadian and U.S. firms are still bound by rules prohibiting non-lawyer ownership.

Even without external funding, a smaller firm can designate a portion of annual profits, perhaps between 1 and 3 percent, to fund a strategic innovation budget. These funds can be used to:

  • Develop internal legal tools
  • Invest in legal technology or AI pilots
  • Hire external consultants or specialists to guide delivery reform

Why this matters:
The goal is not to build a large innovation fund but to consistently invest in ideas that improve client service and internal efficiency. Smaller firms benefit from having fewer stakeholders in funding decisions. Where a large firm might need extensive partner approval for innovation spending, a smaller firm can move quickly on promising opportunities.

Pillar 3: Expand the Definition of “Top Talent”

The third pillar addresses the changing nature of legal talent. Winning firms will compete for the best lawyers and professionals in technology, operations, design, and data analysis.

Smaller firms can:

  • Establish innovation or legal tech roles outside the partner track
  • Introduce bonuses or phantom equity programs tied to firmwide goals
  • Empower business services professionals with real leadership responsibility

Why this matters:
Modern legal services require interdisciplinary thinking. A smaller firm that values and promotes non-legal expertise will be more equipped to innovate and deliver differentiated value to clients.

Pillar 4: Reinvent How Legal Work is Delivered

This pillar focuses on evolving beyond the traditional billable-hour model. Rather than handling each matter as a one-time engagement, firms can develop repeatable service models that deliver continuous client value.

Examples include:

  • Creating subscription-based legal advisory offerings
  • Using automation to streamline document production
  • Building client-facing knowledge portals powered by AI
  • Packaging compliance and regulatory advice into productized services

Why this matters:
Clients want predictable, transparent, and outcomes-focused solutions. A smaller firm offering scalable legal services can grow revenue without relying solely on increasing lawyer hours.

Getting Started Without Overhauling the Entire Firm

You do not need to adopt the entire blueprint all at once. Many firms begin with one or two pilot projects and build from there. For example:

  • Test a subscription pricing model in a specific practice group
  • Allocate a small portion of profits to innovation experiments
  • Appoint a part-time innovation lead to coordinate internal ideas
  • Initiate partner-level conversations about long-term strategy and capital allocation

Each of these actions builds capability and leadership alignment over time.

Final Thought: Small Firms Are Well-Positioned to Lead

As Ted Theodoropoulos observed, “The market doesn’t wait for consensus. It rewards those prepared to lead the change.” Smaller firms don’t need Big Law’s resources to capitalize on current market dynamics. They need strategic clarity, committed leadership, and the confidence to act while competitors hesitate.

The legal industry’s transformation creates unprecedented opportunities for firms willing to embrace change. Smaller firms that move decisively today may find themselves leading the profession tomorrow.

Attribution:
This article is inspired by and references the Four-Pillar Transformation Framework presented in:

Ted Theodoropoulos, “Big Law 2.0: A Radical Transformation Blueprint,” published May 15, 2025. Ted is a Legal Tech Innovator and 2024 ILTA Innovative Leader of the Year.

AI Isn’t Just a “Tech Trend” Anymore: It’s a Strategic Imperative for Law Firms

AI is no longer just a “future issue” for law firms. It’s here, now, reshaping how legal services are delivered, marketed, priced, and governed.

While the headlines often focus on flashy predictions about robots replacing lawyers, today’s real story is more practical and immediate. Strategic law firm leaders are already taking action to integrate AI tools carefully and thoughtfully into their practices. Those who delay risk falling behind, not just in technology, but in profitability, client value, and internal firm operations.

Here are five of the most critical AI trends that law firms should be paying attention to right now:

1. Workflow Automation Is Quietly Transforming Law Practice

AI is already saving significant time on nonbillable tasks. Lawyers are using it for:

  • Drafting internal memos
  • Preparing blog posts and CLE materials
  • Automating document review and templating
  • Managing client intake and onboarding
  • Assisting with billing and collections communications

These small gains add to material profitability improvements, especially for firms that consciously reinvest the saved time into client development or substantive legal work.

If your firm still thinks of AI as “research tools only” or “future tech,” you’re missing today’s real, quiet revolution.

2. Client Expectations Are Shifting Faster Than Firms Realize

Clients, corporate and individual, are starting to assume that firms will use AI where appropriate to:

  • Be more efficient
  • Offer faster turnaround times
  • Price predictably and competitively

If you’re not finding ways to use AI to improve service delivery transparently, clients will notice and may look elsewhere. They won’t always tell you why you lost the work, but efficiency and cost consciousness are becoming default client expectations.

3. AI Governance and Ethics Are Now Strategic Issues

Forward-thinking firms are creating internal AI policies to:

  • Set clear boundaries on client data usage
  • Define when and how AI can assist with work products
  • Train lawyers and staff on ethical AI use
  • Protect confidentiality and privilege

The firms that govern AI well will gain a competitive advantage in risk management and client trust. Those who don’t may be exposed to malpractice risks or damage to their professional reputation.

AI use without governance is a ticking risk.

4. Specialized AI Tools for Law Are Improving Rapidly

It’s not just ChatGPT or Microsoft Copilot anymore.

Legal-specific AI platforms are evolving fast, offering:

  • Contract analysis
  • Litigation prediction tools
  • Due diligence automation
  • Legal research acceleration
  • Billing narrative optimization

Smaller and mid-sized firms now have access to powerful tools that were once available only to big firms with custom-built systems.

If you’re not at least evaluating some of these specialized options, you’re leaving efficiency (and margin) on the table.

5. AI Is Forcing a Re-examination of Pricing Models

If AI makes legal work faster and easier, what does that mean for hourly billing?

Many firms are now:

  • Experimenting with hybrid pricing (time + value factors)
  • Repackaging services into fixed-fee or subscription models
  • Using AI to scope work better and set pricing predictably

The firms that align their pricing models with how they work, including AI-assisted efficiencies, will be better positioned for profitability in the years ahead.

Those who cling to the old hourly model without adjusting for these shifts will feel more and more pricing pressure from the market.

Bottom Line: AI Is a Strategic Leadership Issue, Not an IT Problem

The firms winning with AI aren’t treating it as an “IT department project” or a “junior associate tool.”

They treat it as a leadership-level strategic lever, like hiring, compensation, governance, and client strategy.

You’re already behind the curve if your leadership team isn’t actively discussing AI trends, policies, and opportunities. But it’s not too late to catch up if you act deliberately.

This is the time for measured action, not panic, but waiting passively is no longer a neutral choice.