Category: Firm Governance

Rethinking the COO Role in Law Firms

Law firms have always been led by lawyers. The senior partner was often both rainmaker and chief administrator, managing everything from finances to facilities. That model worked when the business of law was simpler and the competition was local. It no longer fits the complexity of today’s legal market.

It is time to rethink what this role should entail and who is best suited for it.

The Role of the COO

The main role of a COO in a law firm is to run the firm’s business operations. Partners’ time is best spent practicing law and building client relationships. Someone must ensure that the business runs efficiently behind the scenes.

The COO position includes creating the systems and discipline that enable partners to focus on client work. A strong COO connects the dots between finance, operations, people, and strategy. This relieves partners of this task and helps execute the firm’s goals.

The New Skills Required

The skill set for today’s COO has changed. Now legal COOs must be fluent in both management skills and technology. They must understand automation and AI applications that can streamline workflows and improve decision-making.

Strong COOs now act as translators between business strategy and operational execution. They can analyze profitability at the matter and client level. They can interpret financial and operational data to guide strategic investments. And they can communicate these insights to lawyers in ways that lead to action.

The most effective COOs combine four abilities:

  • Operational discipline to ensure the firm’s core systems run smoothly.
  • Financial literacy to create budgets and new pricing models.
  • Technology fluency to identify where automation and AI create leverage.
  • Leadership credibility to influence senior lawyers without authority based on title.

These abilities rarely come from the traditional legal path. That is why many of the most successful COOs in professional services come from finance, consulting, or technology backgrounds.

Why Some Firms Struggle to Empower the COO

Even when firms hire a capable COO, many fail to use the role effectively. In some partnerships, operations managers are limited to managing facilities, HR, or IT. This limits the COO’s ability to execute. Without clear authority, the role becomes reactive rather than strategic.

Empowering a COO requires the managing partner and the executive committee to treat the role as part of firm leadership, not support staff. The COO should sit at the table where strategic and financial decisions are made, with access to the same data and accountability.

The COO and Change Management

Law firms face rising cost pressures and technology-driven disruption. These challenges cannot be solved through individual effort or incremental change. They require systemic thinking, the kind that a professional COO brings.

A forward-looking COO can lead firmwide initiatives in areas such as:

  • Redesigning work allocation models that improve leverage and profitability.
  • Introducing firm-level KPIs and dashboards to measure performance in real time.
  • Managing AI adoption projects across practice groups.
  • Building training programs that develop “business of law” concepts among lawyers.

The goal is to help the Managing Partner execute on the firm’s strategic plan. The COO becomes the connection that links strategy with day-to-day execution. COOs can also take on many of the regular duties of the Managing Partner so that they can focus on higher-level firm strategy and leadership objectives.

What Law Firms Should Do Next

Every firm should begin by asking a simple question: What is our COO actually accountable for? If the answer sounds administrative rather than strategic, the firm may be missing an opportunity.

The next step is to align the COO’s role with measurable outcomes. Examples include improvement in profit per partner or percentage of work automated. These are results that move the firm forward and justify the investment in senior operational leadership.

Closing Thoughts

The modern law firm operates more like a business than a traditional partnership. Rethinking the COO role involves giving COOs more authority and accountability to give the firm a strategic advantage. This can also lead to non-lawyer COOs becoming CEOs or recruiting non-lawyer CEOs from other industries. Given the immense changes happening in the legal industry today, high-end professional management in law firms is becoming a must-have in order to succeed.

The Unseen Cost of Partner Misalignment

Law firms don’t often fail because their lawyers aren’t good enough. They fail because the partners aren’t on the same page.

Firms may look strong on paper if they are profitable and have good clients. But underneath, conflicting partner priorities and misaligned incentives slowly eat away at profits and stall innovation.

People often don’t notice this misalignment until it’s too late.

How to Tell if Your Partners Aren’t on the Same Page

When partners aren’t aligned, it shows up in small ways that affect both the way things work and the way people act. One partner is building long-term relationships with clients, while the other is maximizing billable hours. The result is that clients have different experiences and there is tension over how files are staffed.

Incentives that reward only billings or originations put partners in competition with each other, which makes it less likely that they will work as a team or share information. Leadership agrees on growth goals, but without support from all partners, strategic plans stay on hold.

The issue is not a deficiency of talent. It’s that the partnership is going in different directions.

The True Cost of Misalignment

Misalignment has a cost that can be measured in dollars. High-value clients go to competitors because the service is inconsistent. Associates leave because the partner they work for decides not to mentor and delegate. Partners don’t want to make changes that could hurt their pay, so investments in AI or changes to pricing models get put on hold.

Even small cracks in alignment can lead to lost revenue and a weaker market position.

Making Things Fit Together

To get everyone on the same page, firms need to deal with the things that really change how partners act. Compensation systems influence what partners should focus on, and they should reward working together and building client relationships. Plans must be directly linked to partner interests in order to be successful. If a strategy doesn’t make it clear how it helps each partner, it won’t get off the ground.

Firms need effective management that ensures decisions are made promptly and carried out. Without accountability, alignment quickly disappears. When these levers work together, partners start to pull in the same direction.

The Chance to Align

Aligned partnerships lead to huge benefits. Clients get the same level of service from every practice group and matter. Associates are less likely to leave because they get better training and mentoring. Partners see innovation projects as shared goals, not threats, which helps them move forward.

Alignment does more than just stop problems. It speeds up growth and profit.

The Bottom Line

The biggest threat to a law firm isn’t other law firms. It’s not being aligned inside.

When partners put their own goals ahead of the firm’s goals, strategies don’t work and innovation stalls. But when pay, strategy, and governance are all in line, the firm has a big advantage over its competitors.

The cost of being out of alignment is high. The benefits of alignment are even greater.

Can a Small or Mid-sized Firm Lead the Legal Transformation?

How Smaller Firms Can Adapt the Four-Pillar Blueprint to Win

The legal industry stands at a crossroads. While Big Law firms grapple with their transformation challenges, smaller and mid-sized firms possess a hidden advantage that could reshape the competitive landscape entirely.

A compelling strategic framework, introduced by Ted Theodoropoulos in his article “Big Law 2.0: A Radical Transformation Blueprint” (May 2025), outlines a powerful approach. Theodoropoulos proposes that firms revisit their foundational strategies around structure, funding, talent, and delivery.

Although his blueprint targets large firms and assumes eventual regulatory reform, the core concepts are highly relevant to firms with fewer than 100 lawyers. With some adjustments, smaller firms can use this approach to create meaningful differentiation and future-proof their practices.

Pillar 1: Create a “NewLaw” Division Inside the Firm

Rather than splitting the firm into two separate entities, a smaller firm can carve out a focused internal division dedicated to innovation. This unit can run pilot programs that test new service models, such as fixed-fee offerings, AI-assisted research, or client subscription packages.

Even a small team, e.g. one or two lawyers supported by a tech-savvy coordinator, can progress if given the space to operate outside traditional billable-hour metrics.

Why this matters for smaller firms:
Mid-sized firms are typically more agile than large national or international firms. This agility allows them to pilot new approaches without being delayed by layers of internal approval. Small, targeted projects launched today can generate a lasting competitive advantage.

Pillar 2: Fund Innovation with Purpose (No Outside Capital Required)

Theodoropoulos advocates for private equity or IPO capital in the original blueprint to drive innovation. While this may be viable in jurisdictions with alternative business structures, most Canadian and U.S. firms are still bound by rules prohibiting non-lawyer ownership.

Even without external funding, a smaller firm can designate a portion of annual profits, perhaps between 1 and 3 percent, to fund a strategic innovation budget. These funds can be used to:

  • Develop internal legal tools
  • Invest in legal technology or AI pilots
  • Hire external consultants or specialists to guide delivery reform

Why this matters:
The goal is not to build a large innovation fund but to consistently invest in ideas that improve client service and internal efficiency. Smaller firms benefit from having fewer stakeholders in funding decisions. Where a large firm might need extensive partner approval for innovation spending, a smaller firm can move quickly on promising opportunities.

Pillar 3: Expand the Definition of “Top Talent”

The third pillar addresses the changing nature of legal talent. Winning firms will compete for the best lawyers and professionals in technology, operations, design, and data analysis.

Smaller firms can:

  • Establish innovation or legal tech roles outside the partner track
  • Introduce bonuses or phantom equity programs tied to firmwide goals
  • Empower business services professionals with real leadership responsibility

Why this matters:
Modern legal services require interdisciplinary thinking. A smaller firm that values and promotes non-legal expertise will be more equipped to innovate and deliver differentiated value to clients.

Pillar 4: Reinvent How Legal Work is Delivered

This pillar focuses on evolving beyond the traditional billable-hour model. Rather than handling each matter as a one-time engagement, firms can develop repeatable service models that deliver continuous client value.

Examples include:

  • Creating subscription-based legal advisory offerings
  • Using automation to streamline document production
  • Building client-facing knowledge portals powered by AI
  • Packaging compliance and regulatory advice into productized services

Why this matters:
Clients want predictable, transparent, and outcomes-focused solutions. A smaller firm offering scalable legal services can grow revenue without relying solely on increasing lawyer hours.

Getting Started Without Overhauling the Entire Firm

You do not need to adopt the entire blueprint all at once. Many firms begin with one or two pilot projects and build from there. For example:

  • Test a subscription pricing model in a specific practice group
  • Allocate a small portion of profits to innovation experiments
  • Appoint a part-time innovation lead to coordinate internal ideas
  • Initiate partner-level conversations about long-term strategy and capital allocation

Each of these actions builds capability and leadership alignment over time.

Final Thought: Small Firms Are Well-Positioned to Lead

As Ted Theodoropoulos observed, “The market doesn’t wait for consensus. It rewards those prepared to lead the change.” Smaller firms don’t need Big Law’s resources to capitalize on current market dynamics. They need strategic clarity, committed leadership, and the confidence to act while competitors hesitate.

The legal industry’s transformation creates unprecedented opportunities for firms willing to embrace change. Smaller firms that move decisively today may find themselves leading the profession tomorrow.

Attribution:
This article is inspired by and references the Four-Pillar Transformation Framework presented in:

Ted Theodoropoulos, “Big Law 2.0: A Radical Transformation Blueprint,” published May 15, 2025. Ted is a Legal Tech Innovator and 2024 ILTA Innovative Leader of the Year.